Beverly Ricardo Mangum, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Williams, L.s. Lawson, D.c. Bickley, E.d. Wise, P.j. Gunney,defendants-appellees, 944 F.2d 901 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-90-415-AM)
Beverly Ricardo Mangum, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Beverly Ricardo Mangum appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mangum v. Williams, CA-90-415-AM (E.D. Va. May 16, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
