Jim L. Gordon, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert J. Arndel, Margaret I. Arndel, Lynn D. Hyland,defendants-appellees, 942 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 942 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1991) Submitted Aug. 23, 1991. *Decided Aug. 30, 1991

Before BROWNING, FARRIS and WILLIAM A. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Jim L. Gordon appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's Memorandum Decision and Order.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.