Unpublished Disposition, 937 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 937 F.2d 613 (9th Cir. 1991)

Marvin MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Sanford FELDMAN, Hershel T. Elkins, John Van De Kamp; J.A.Gordnier, Barbara Yanow Johnson, Eugene Dague,Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-55745.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 4, 1991.* Decided June 28, 1991.

Before D.W. NELSON, O'SCANNLAIN, and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Appellant Marvin Miller filed this action pro se alleging a conspiracy between, inter alia, San Diego and Riverside County officials, the California Attorney General, and the Fourth Appellate District of the California Court of Appeals. Yet there lies before Miller a string of legal barriers too numerous to list. We mention but a few: absolute immunity for persons performing judicial functions, see Butz v. Economou, 438 U.S. 478, 510-13 (1978), including prosecutors, see Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976); Eleventh Amendment immunity shielding state officials acting in their official capacity; and the need to identify an official policy or custom before imposing liability on a government subdivision. See St. Louis v. Praprotnik, 485 U.S. 112 (1988). The district court's order granting defendants' motion to dismiss is hereby

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3