James Arthur Young, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James P. Brown, Director, Industrial Security Clearancereview, Defendant-appellee, 932 F.2d 964 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-88-2923-WN)
James Arthur Young, appellant pro se.
Robert Mason Thomas, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James Arthur Young appeals from the district court's order granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment in Young's civil suit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.1 Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Brown, CA-88-2923-WN (D. Md. Nov. 14, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
We deny Young's motion for a default judgment
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
