Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Emmit Daniel, Defendant-appellant, 927 F.2d 605 (6th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseOn Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, No. 89-20067; Horton, C.J.
W.D. Tenn.
AFFIRMED.
Before RYAN and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant, Emmit Daniel, appeals his conviction entered upon a jury verdict. Defendant's appeal is based upon the sufficiency of the evidence.
Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that the conviction should be affirmed.
When one considers in a light most favorable to the government the presence of the blender and of the cutting agent, and the testimony concerning the unusually high purity of the cocaine and the large quantity that would result from its dilution, one is unable to say that a reasonable jury could not find the requisite elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
