Unpublished Dispositiondonna L. Nichols, Personal Representative of the Estate Ofernest Nichols, Deceased, et al. v. Board of Trustees of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pensionplan, et al., Appellants, 927 F.2d 1258 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAFFIRMED.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG, and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of appellees' motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto, and the replies, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum opinions filed March 22, 1990, and April 24, 1990. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C. Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
