Unpublished Dispositionwestern Union Corporation, Petitioner, v. Melvin Peck and Director, Office of Workers' Compensationprograms, United States Department of Labor, Respondents.western Union Corporation, Petitioner, v. Melvin Peck and Director, Office of Workers' Compensationprograms, United States Department of Labor, Respondents, 927 F.2d 1258 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 927 F.2d 1258 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Feb. 28, 1991

DISMISSED.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH BADER GINSBURG and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Upon consideration of the motions to dismiss, and the response thereto, the motion to transfer and consolidate petitions for review, the response thereto, and the reply, and the motion to consolidate, it is

ORDERED that the motions to dismiss be granted. The Benefit Review Board's orders remanding the case for further proceedings are not final for purposes of judicial review. See WMATA v. Director, Office of Workers' Comp. Program, 824 F.2d 94, 95 (D.C. Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (BRB decision remanding case to ALJ for determination of damages and further factfinding not final and hence not immediately appealable); Am. Hawaii Cruises v. Skinner, 893 F.2d 1400, 1402 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (per curiam) (district court's remand order not final despite dismissal of court action). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to enter this order on the docket of both No. 90-1329 and No. 90-1487.

The Clerk is further directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.