Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America v. Kenneth Rice, Appellant, 925 F.2d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 925 F.2d 490 (D.C. Cir. 1991) Feb. 4, 1991

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and HARRY T. EDWARDS and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was considered on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and on the briefs filed by the parties and argument by counsel. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c).

We review the district court's decision to allow the government to present testimony and documents relating to appellant's automobile lease under the plain error standard. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b). Admission of the disputed evidence did not undermine the fundamental fairness of the trial or contribute to a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1, 15-16 (1985). It is accordingly

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the convictions are affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15(b) (2).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.