Unpublished Dispositionjames M. Murray Aka James Hines, Appellant, v. Douglas W. Stempson, Administrator, et al, 925 F.2d 489 (D.C. Cir. 1991)

Upon consideration of the motion for remand; the suggestion that this court certify to the United States Supreme Court questions and propositions of law presented in the motion for remand; the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; appellant's request for oral argument; and appellant's motion requesting that records be transmitted and filed with this court, it is

ORDERED, on the court's own motion, that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant's motion seeking relief from the district court's order of dismissal was served within ten days of that order and thus constitutes a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). See Moy v. Howard University, 843 F.2d 1504, 1505 (D.C. Cir. 1988). Accordingly, the notice of appeal "has no effect." Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motions be dismissed as moot.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.