Unpublished Dispositionequal Employment Opportunity Commission v. District of Columbia Department of Human Services, Appellant, 925 F.2d 488 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore MIKVA, Chief Judge, and SENTELLE and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motion to vacate district court judgment and remand to district court with a direction to dismiss, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted. The district court's order filed January 31, 1990, is vacated and the case is remanded with instructions to dismiss. See United States v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36, 39-40 (1950). The parties' settlement of their dispute has rendered this case moot. See Ruiz v. Estelle, 688 F.2d 266 (5th Cir. 1982) (partial vacatur, limited to issue parties had settled), cited with approval in Clarke v. United States, 915 F.2d 699, 706 (D.C. Cir. 1990) ( (en banc).
The Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a certified copy of this order to the district court in lieu of formal mandate.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
