Charles Thomas Locklear, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, H.r. Powell, Warden, J.c. Farrow, Mrs. A.edwards, Defendants-appellees, 924 F.2d 1052 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate Judge. (CA-89-241-R)
Charles Thomas Locklear, appellant pro se.
Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Charles Thomas Locklear appeals from the magistrate judge's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.* Our review of the record discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Locklear v. Murray, CA-89-241-R (E.D. Va. Sept. 27, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
