Telesaver, Incorporated, Vista Technologies, Incorporated,plaintiffs-appellants, v. United States Transmission Systems, Incorporated, Defendant-appellee,andrichard J. Goldman, Counterclaim Defendant, 923 F.2d 849 (4th Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Norman P. Ramsey, District Judge. (CA-86-2300-R)
Franklin Terrell Caudill, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md. (Argued), for appellants; Harry M. Rifkin, Semmes, Bowen & Semmes, Baltimore, Md., on brief.
John Sargent Kinzey, Jr., Leboeuf, Lamb, Leiby & Macrae, New York City (Argued), for appellee; John M. Aerni, Leboeuf, Lamb, Leiby & McRae, New York City, Michael D. Berman, Kaplan, Heyman, Greenberg, Engleman & Belgrad, P.A., Baltimore, Md., on brief.
D. Md., 687 F. Supp. 997.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and ROBERT R. MERHIGE, Jr., Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
Telesaver, Inc. and Vista Technologies, Inc. appeal on a multitude of grounds the decisions of the district court in the resolution of this case which dealt principally with an alleged breach of contract. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Telesaver, Inc. v. United States Transmission Systems, Inc., CA-86-2300-R (D. Md. March 7, 1990); Telesaver, Inc. v. United States Transmission Systems, Inc., 687 F. Supp. 997 (D. Md. 1988). Finding no error on the part of the district court, we affirm.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
