In Re Flight Resources, Incorporated, Debtor.richard C. Bartel, Debtor-appellant, v. Richard H. Gins, Trustee-appellee, 919 F.2d 734 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 919 F.2d 734 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Sept. 26, 1990. Decided Dec. 10, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1048-H)

Richard C. Bartel, appellant pro se.

Richard H. Gins, Appellee.

D. Md.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Richard C. Bartel appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for leave to appeal an order of the bankruptcy court. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d) this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final judgments, decisions, orders, and decrees issued by the district courts in cases originating in the bankruptcy courts. When a district court reviews an interlocutory order or decree of a bankruptcy judge, no appeal may be taken from the action of the district court. See Capitol Credit Plan v. Shaffer, --- F.2d ----, Nos. 88-2877(L) (4th Cir. Sept. 10, 1990).

Because this appeal arises from the interlocutory decisions of the bankruptcy court, which the district court refused to hear, Bartel v. Gins, CA-90-1048-H (D. Md. June 1, 1990), we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we also deny Bartel's motion for injunction and stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.