Unpublished Dispositionwilliam H. Hernstadt, et al., Appellant, v. Federal Communications Comm'n, Appellee, 919 F.2d 182 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 919 F.2d 182 (D.C. Cir. 1990) Dec. 5, 1990

Before MIKVA, STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This case was considered on appeal from the Federal Communications Commission, Valley Broadcasting Co., 4 F.C.C. Rcd. 2611 (Rev.Bd.1989), review denied, 5 F.C.C. Rcd. 499 (1990), and on the briefs filed by the parties and arguments by counsel. Finding that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion, see D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c), we conclude that substantial evidence supports the Review Board's resolution of the underlying factual issues and its renewal of the intervenor's broadcast license. See Central Florida Enterprises, Inc. v. FCC, 683 F.2d 503 (D.C. Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1084 (1983). It is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the Commission's decision is affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.