Reginald Clinton Stitt, Petitioner-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director, Respondent-appellee, 918 F.2d 174 (4th Cir. 1990)Annotate this Case
Submitted Oct. 29, 1990. Decided Nov. 19, 1990
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-451-R)
Reginald Clinton Stitt, appellant pro se.
Robert Quentin Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Reginald Clinton Stitt seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stitt v. Murray, CA-89-451-R (W.D. Va. May 22, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.