Larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Toni v. Bair, Regional Administrator, Defendant-appellee.larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gaddy, C/o Sergeant Henderson, Rollette, C/), Captainbarksdale, Defendants-appellees.larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Sergeant Kyle, David Williams, Barrymarano, Sergeant Johnson, Captain Barksdale,defendants-appellees.larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Nurse Thompson, Defendant-appellee.larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward Murray, David Williams, Doctor Barnes, Nurse Terrell,m.e. Riddle, D. Jefferson, Defendants-appellees.larry Ray Johnson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Asbury, Barry Steve Mariano, David Williams, R.a.lipsner, Layton Laster, Joe Edmond, Mr. Saunders, Mr. Gorge,a. Johnson, Mrs. Riddle, Toni v. Bair, D. Jefferson, E.braksdale, Sergeant Evanchyk, Ms. Hembrick, R. Kaleski,davis Pierson, Sergeant Cassell, Doctor Barnes, T.r. Israel,assistant Warden Jarvis, Counselor Ocheltree, Ms. Staton,warden Thompson, Thomas Bullock, Sgt. Moore, Ms. Connors,bessie Parrious, Ms. Day, B. Roger, J. Boswell, Gaddy,correctional Officer, Defendants-appellees, 918 F.2d 173 (4th Cir. 1990)Annotate this Case
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-90-1094-AM, CA-90-839-AM, CA-90-1095-AM, CA-90-1093-AM, CA-90-1165-AM, CA-90-1166-AM)
Larry Ray Johnson, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
Larry Ray Johnson appeals from the district court's orders denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissing his five separate civil complaints. See Graham v. Riddle, 554 F.2d 133 (4th Cir. 1977). Our review of the records and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we deny leave to appeal in forma pauperis and dismiss these appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Bair, CA-90-1094-AM; Johnson v. Gaddy, CA-90-839-AM; Johnson v. Murray, CA-90-1095-AM; Johnson v. Nurse Thompson, CA-90-1093-AM; Johnson v. Murray, CA-90-1165-AM; Johnson v. Asbury, CA-90-1166-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 1990; Aug. 28, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.