Anthony Jerome Turner, Plaintiff-appellant. v. Fred Greene, Warden, James Clark, Assistantwarden--operations, David L. Graham, Assistantwarden--treatment, Sgt. Carter, B-building Manager, Sgt.bruce, B-building Manager, Officer Macklin, Defendants-appellees, 917 F.2d 23 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 917 F.2d 23 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Oct. 1, 1990. Decided Oct. 30, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-90-35-R)

Anthony Jerome Turner, appellant pro se.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Anthony Jerome Turner appeals the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. Acting pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, the district court ordered appellant to exhaust administrative remedies and to advise the court within 100 days of the result of the administrative proceedings. It warned appellant that failure to advise the court regarding exhaustion would result in dismissal of the action. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice upon expiration of the 100-day period, appellant not having complied with its order.

The district court could properly require exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Its dismissal of the action, without prejudice, when appellant failed to comply with its order was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the judgment below.*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

Because the dismissal was without prejudice Turner is free to file anther 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action once he has exhausted his administrative remedies

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.