Unpublished Dispositionlarry Bedwell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-appellee, 917 F.2d 1304 (6th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 917 F.2d 1304 (6th Cir. 1990) Nov. 8, 1990

Before DAVID A. NELSON and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and HIGGINS, District Judge.* 

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff, Larry Bedwell, appeals from an order of the district court which affirmed the denial of benefits.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are unable to say that denial of benefits is not supported by substantial evidence. Accordingly, the motion for remand is denied, and the order of the district court is affirmed.

As the issuance of a written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose, in view of the magistrate having articulated the reasons why judgment should be entered for the Secretary, we affirm the order of the district court upon the reasoning set out by the magistrate in his Report and Recommendation dated February 1, 1989, and by the district court in its Decision filed December 7, 1989.

 *

The Honorable Thomas A. Higgins, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Tennessee, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.