United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Norman Young, Defendant-appellant, 915 F.2d 1566 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 915 F.2d 1566 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Aug. 28, 1990. Decided Oct. 1, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied Nov. 8, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Fayetteville. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-86-63-CR-3; CA-90-28-CIV-3)

Norman Young, appellant pro se.

Thomas Philip Swain, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, N.C., for appellee.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Norman Young appeals from the district court's order dismissing his federal suit alleging that his plea agreement had been violated. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.*  Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Young, CR-86-63-CR-3; CA-90-28-CIV-3 (E.D.N.C. July 9, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

In his informal brief Young claims that he should have received concurrent, rather than consecutive, sentences. Because this issue was not raised before the district court, we decline to decide its merit on appeal

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.