Unpublished Dispositionrichard A. Parrott, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard Cheney, Secretary of Defense, Defendant-appellee, 914 F.2d 248 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-88-3486-H)
James G. Kolb, Rockville, Maryland, for appellant.
Breckinridge L. Willcox, United States Attorney, Dale P. Kelberman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and N. CARLTON TILLEY, Jr., United States District Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
Richard A. Parrott has appealed from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant in Parrott's employment discrimination suit. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that Parrott's appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parrott v. Cheney, CA-88-3486-H (D. Md. Nov. 7, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
