Michael Sindram, Plaintiff-appellant, v. J. James Mckenna; Paul H. Weinstein; Stanley B. Frosh,jr.; John J. Mitchell; David Brand Pleat; Timothy Shay;carey Geddes; Joseph v. Truhe, Jr.; George P. Kimmel;william C. Ferguson; Raymond M. Kight, Defendants-appellees, 905 F.2d 1531 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard and Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judges. (C/A No. 90-688-S)
Michael Sindram, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Sindram appeals from the orders of the district court denying his motion for an injunction and for a temporary restraining order, and dismissing his civil action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Our review of the record and the district court's orders discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of the motion for an injunction, and the dismissal of the complaint, on the reasoning of the district court. Sindram v. McKenna, C/A No. 90-688-S (D. Md. Mar. 2 and Mar. 16, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
