Karl Burnett, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James William Hong; Beverly Carroll, Defendants-appellees, 902 F.2d 27 (4th Cir. 1990)Annotate this Case
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1547-S)
Karl Burnett, appellant pro se.
Jeanne Marie Phelan, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
Karl Burnett appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Title VII action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burnett v. Hong, C/A No. 89-1547-S (D. Md. Oct. 4, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.