United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Ruben Almaguer, Defendant-appellant, 902 F.2d 1566 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 902 F.2d 1566 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted Dec. 11, 1989. Decided April 25, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR No. 86-117-A)

Ruben Almaguer, appellant pro se.

Kenneth E. Melson, Assistant United States Attorney, for appellee.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Ruben Almaguer appeals from the district court's denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence made pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). Almaguer contends that the district court imposed an unauthorized three-year special parole term as part of his sentence for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841.

The offense occurred in June 1984. At that time, Sec. 841 provided for a three-year special parole term regardless of the amount of cocaine involved in the offense. Although Almaguer pled guilty and was sentenced after the 1984 amendments to Sec. 841 went into effect, the applicable sentencing provisions are those in effect at the time of the offense. United States v. Hutchins, 818 F.2d 322 (5th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 56 U.S.L.W. 3500 (U.S. Jan. 25, 1988) (No. 87-606). The sentence imposed was therefore correct and the district court properly denied the Rule 35(a) motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.