Unpublished Dispositionjohnnie Tasby, A/k/a Akili S. Amen-ra, Appellant, v. Joseph F. Spaniol, Jr., Christopher W. Vasil, Deputy Clerk,u.s. Supreme Court, 902 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 902 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1990) May 24, 1990

Before MIKVA, BUCKLEY and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This appeal was considered on the record and the briefs from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. Rule 14(c). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's orders filed December 16, 1988 and January 3, 1989 be affirmed. Mandamus was inappropriate because appellant had an alternative remedy, a motion to the Supreme Court seeking review of appellees' conduct. See Borntrager v. Stevas, 772 F.2d 419, 421 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1008 (1985). Accordingly, the district court properly dismissed appellant's complaint.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.