Unpublished Disposition, 900 F.2d 262 (9th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 900 F.2d 262 (9th Cir. 1989)

CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurancecorporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.OLYMPIC PREFABRICATORS, INC., a Washington corporation;Telon Electric, Inc., a Washington corporation; LarryMailloux and Jane Doe Mailloux, his wife, and the maritalcommunity composed thereof, Defendants-Appellants.CONSOLIDATED AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurancecorporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.OLYMPIC PREFABRICATORS, INC., a Washington corporation;Telon Electric, Inc., a Washington corporation; LarryMailloux and Jane Doe Mailloux, his wife, and the maritalcommunity composed thereof, Defendants,andNolet Electric, Inc., a Washington corporation; UDLElectric, Inc., a Washington corporation; Joseph Cadden andJane Doe Cadden, his wife, and the marital communitycomposed thereof, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 89-35187, 89-35284 and 89-35302.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 1990.Decided April 24, 1990.

Before WALLACE, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

These appeals are from entry of a summary judgment and denial of a motion for reconsideration by the district court. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and we have jurisdiction over these timely appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the reasons stated by Judge Coughenour in his order dated February 3, 1989, we affirm. Only the claim of Jane Doe (Barbara) Mailloux is not mentioned in Judge Coughenour's order, but there was no showing that she was an assured under the insurance policy, and there is no demonstration that the summary judgment was not properly entered against her.

AFFIRMED.

Note: This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the Courts of this Circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.