United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Darryl Todd Holmes, Defendant-appellant, 898 F.2d 148 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Robert D. Potter, Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 89-56-ST-C; CR. No. 88-30-3-ST-CR)
Darryl Todd Holmes, appellant pro se.
Thomas J. Ashcraft, Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.
W.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Darryl Todd Holmes appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Holmes, C/A No. 89-56-ST-C; CR No. 88-30-3-ST-CR (W.D.N.C. May 5, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
