Raymond A. Arrington, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Steele Sessions, Director, Federal Bureau Ofinvestigation, Defendant-appellee, 898 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 898 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted: Jan. 25, 1990. Decided: Feb. 28, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 29, 1990

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1865-JH)

Raymond A. Arrington, appellant pro se.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Raymond A. Arrington appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Bivens*  action without prejudice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Arrington v. Sessions, C/A No. 89-1865-JH (D. Md. July 18, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

 *

Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)