Raymond A. Arrington, Plaintiff-appellant, v. William Steele Sessions, Director, Federal Bureau Ofinvestigation, Defendant-appellee, 898 F.2d 144 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-1865-JH)
Raymond A. Arrington, appellant pro se.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Raymond A. Arrington appeals from the district court's order dismissing his Bivens* action without prejudice. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Arrington v. Sessions, C/A No. 89-1865-JH (D. Md. July 18, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
