Victoria P. Rusbosin; Vincent Rusbosin, Ii, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Kevin E. Pugh, Defendant-appellee,andbernard D. Crooke; Montgomery County, Maryland, Defendants, 894 F.2d 402 (4th Cir. 1990)
Annotate this CaseVictoria P. Rusbosin, Vincent Rusbosin, II, appellants pro se.
Karen Louise Federman, Linda D. Berk, Clyde H. Sorrell, County Attorney's Office, for Appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL and K.K. HALL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Victoria and Vincent Rusbosin appeal the judgment against them on their federal constitutional and pendent state law claims. The claims arose out of events surrounding Victoria Rusbosin's arrest and subsequent acquittal. We have examined the record and we find no reversible error.1 We therefore affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and oral argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The Rusbosins argued that the jury instructions on immunity were improper and they requested a transcript of those instructions at government expense. We decline to order a transcript. The appellee submitted copies of the jury instructions on immunity, and we find that these instructions accurately stated the law. The Rusbosins have not suggested that the instructions submitted by the appellee were not in fact the instructions given at trial
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
