Lewis M. Scarborough, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Mike Norwood; Randy E. Lee, Defendants-appellees, 894 F.2d 402 (4th Cir. 1990)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 894 F.2d 402 (4th Cir. 1990) Submitted: Nov. 30, 1989. Decided: Jan. 9, 1990

Lewis M. Scarborough, appellant pro se.

Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Lewis M. Scarborough appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scarborough v. Norwood, CA-88-361-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1989).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.