Charles Arthur Young, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James E. Johnson, G.p. Dodson, D. Craun, R.n. Fincham,raymond M. Muncy, H. Catron, J. Holman, W. Wherry, F.l.settle, L.b. Cei, B. Soles, C.d. Larsen, Robert A. Lipsner,unknown Defendants, Unknown Chairman, Defendants-appellees, 888 F.2d 1387 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 888 F.2d 1387 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted April 20, 1989. Decided Oct. 13, 1989

Charles Arthur Young, appellant pro se.

William W. Muse, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellees.

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Charles Arthur Young appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young v. Johnson, C/A No. 88-147-L (W.D. Va. Mar. 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.