Paul E. Gullet, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Smith, Chairman Maryland Parole Commission, Williamdonald Schaefer, Dan D. Zauaggini, Parole Commissioner, Mr.pennewell, Parole Hearing Officer for Eci, John Doe, Paroleagent (mhc), James Chestnut, Classification Counselor, Janedoe, Parole Agent (bbcf), Janet Williams, Classificationcounselor, Cherry Dogne, Parole Agent (eci), M.a. Shores,classification Counselor, Defendants-appellees.paul E. Gullet, Plaintiff-appellant, v. John Smith, Chairman Maryland Parole Commission, Williamdonald Schaefer, Dan D. Zauaggini, Parole Commissioner, Mr.pennewell, Parole Hearing Officer for Eci, John Doe, Paroleagent (mhc), James Chestnut, Classification Counselor, Janedoe, Parole Agent (bbcf), Janet Williams, Classificationcounselor, Cherry Dogne, Parole Agent (eci), M.a. Shores,classification Counselor, Defendants-appellees, 888 F.2d 1386 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CasePaul E. Gullet, appellant pro se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Office of the Attorney of Maryland, for appellees.
Before K.K. HALL, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Paul Gullet appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gullet v. Smith, C/A No. 88-3029-H (D. Md. Oct. 20, 1988; Feb. 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
