Donald Cameron Frye, Petitioner-appellant, v. C.a. Meares; Attorney General of the State of Northcarolina, Respondents-appellees, 887 F.2d 1079 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseDonald Cameron Frye, appellant pro se.
Lacy Herman Thornburg (Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina), for appellees.
Before WIDENER, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Donald Cameron Frye seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Frye v. Meares, C/A No. 89-195-C-C-M (W.D.N.C. May 19, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
While Frye has not stated a federal constitutional violation, he may be entitled to review in state court under N.C.Gen.Stat. Sec. 15-196.4. See also Potter v. State, 263 N.C. 114, 117, 139 S.E.2d 4, 7 (1964)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
