Unpublished Disposition, 884 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1989)Annotate this Case
Stanley Ezell SINGLETON, Petitioner-Appellant,v.Robert DARAN; and John K. Van De Kamp, Respondents-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 19, 1989.* Decided Aug. 30, 1989.
Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, and POOLE and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
We affirm the district court's order denying Singleton's 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. After the district court entered its order denying habeas relief, the California Court of Appeals affirmed Singleton's conviction. If this subsequent event has resulted in an exhaustion of state remedies, Singleton may file a new Section 2254 habeas petition in district court.