Carlton Matthew Wheeler, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Norma B. Gluckstern, Director Patuxent Institution,defendant-appellee, 884 F.2d 1390 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseCarlton Matthew Wheeler, appellant pro se.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Carlton Matthew Wheeler appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.1 Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wheeler v. Gluckstern, C/A No. 88-3820-HAR (D. Md. Jan. 3, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.2
AFFIRMED.
We have addressed only Wheeler's claims regarding the denial of procedural rights under Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539 (1974). Wheeler's other claims regarding whether he is entitled to credit for time while on escape status are properly considered under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. See Todd v. Baskerville, 712 F.2d 70 (4th Cir. 1983). We note that Wheeler has a Sec. 2254 petition concerning these issues in the district court
In light of our disposition, we deny Wheeler's request for the appointment of counsel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
