Samuel Wayne Guy, Plaintiff-appellant v. James G. Martin, Aaron J. Johnson, John G. Patseavouras,e.s. Thomas, David W. Chester, Richard Panek,nathan Rice, Defendants-appellees, 884 F.2d 1388 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 884 F.2d 1388 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted June 26, 1989. Decided Aug. 15, 1989

Samuel Wayne Guy, appellant pro se.

Lucien Capone, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.

PER CURIAM:


Samuel Wayne Guy appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Guy v. Martin, CA-87-408-CRT (E.D.N.C. December 14, 1988). We deny Guy's motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.