Jerome E. Cassell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray; R.f. Wilson, Robert F. Powell, R.c.nixon, Defendants-appellees, 883 F.2d 68 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseJerome E. Cassell, appellant pro se.
Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jerome E. Cassell appeals from the United States Magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate. Cassell v. Murray, CA-88-741-R (E.D. Va., March 24, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.1
AFFIRMED.
When construed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Cassell's allegations also lack merit
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
