Timothy Carness Autry, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sergeant Richardson, Aaron Johnson, B.a. Hoffner, Gary T.dixon, Lieutenant Lamm, Sergeant Wilson, C.d. Hayslett, D.l.alford, Officer Hart, Officer Young, Officer Mclaughlin,d.r. Hayes, G. Williams, Central Prison Law Library,defendants-appellees, 878 F.2d 378 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 878 F.2d 378 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted Feb. 28, 1989. Decided June 27, 1989

Timothy Carness Autry, appellant pro se.

Howard Edwin Hill, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.

Before WIDENER, SPROUSE, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Timothy Carness Autry appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Autry v. Richardson, C/A No. 88-232-CRT (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.