Timothy Ray Tann, Plaintiff-appellant, v. North Carolina Department of Correction, Randy E. Lee, Mrs.hux, Defendants-appellees, 878 F.2d 1431 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseTimothy Ray Tann, appellant pro se.
Lacy Herman Thornburg, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.
Before SPROUSE, CHAPMAN, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Ray Tann appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tann v. North Carolina Department of Correction, CA-89-7-CRT (E.D.N.C. Feb. 14, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
