Unpublished Disposition, 875 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1989)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 875 F.2d 319 (9th Cir. 1989)

Nos. 87-1914, 87-1915.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Before WALLACE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and JAMES M. BURNS,**  District Judge.

ORDER

Yang appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of McCarthy, Rees, Dooman, and Markey, and the denial of Yang's motions for summary judgment in Yang's two actions brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1342. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. For the reasons stated by the magistrate, whose findings and recommendations were adopted in full by the district court and formed the basis of its orders, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

Note: This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the Courts of this Circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

 **

Honorable James M. Burns, United States District Judge, District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.