Edward A. Ganey, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Robert Spell, Joseph Mcqueen, and All Others Unknown Inconcert or Participation with Them, Each in Thisofficial And/or Personal/individualcapacities, Defendants-appellees, 875 F.2d 314 (4th Cir. 1989)Annotate this Case
Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appellant pro se.
William McBlief, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, for appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
Edward A. Ganey, Jr. appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ganey v. Spell, C/A No. 88-561-CRT (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.