James Byrd Miller, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Rosetta E. Harrison, Defendant-appellee, 873 F.2d 1439 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseJames B. Miller, appellant pro se.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
James Byrd Miller appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate* discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Harrison, C/A No. 88-1095-WS (M.D.N.C. Dec. 23, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Miller's reason for failing to object to the magistrate's report may be grounds to excuse his default, but nevertheless, we note that the appeal is wholly without foundation and the magistrate's report is fully supported by the record
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
