Unpublished Dispositionindiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent, 871 F.2d 155 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 871 F.2d 155 (D.C. Cir. 1989) March 24, 1989

Before HARRY T. EDWARDS and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges, and FRANK A. KAUFMAN, United States Senior District Judge* .


This petition was considered on the record from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. The court concludes that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant an opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 14(c). We are satisfied, after full review of the matter, that there is no cause to disturb the approval granted by the Commission to Northern Indiana Public Service Company's proposed restructuring. It is therefore

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the petition for review be denied and that the order approving the reorganization be affirmed.


Sitting by designation pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 294(d)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.