Unpublished Dispositionstanley Boswell, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the State of Michigan, Department of Corrections; Robertbrown; Dennis Brogert; Dennis Hammond,defendants-appellees, 869 F.2d 1488 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 869 F.2d 1488 (6th Cir. 1989) Feb. 7, 1989

Before MERRITT and MILBURN, Circuit Judges, and LIVELY, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

This matter is before the court upon consideration of its order of November 28, 1988, directing appellant to show cause as to why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant has not responded to that order.

Review of the record indicates that the district court entered its final judgment dismissing appellant's cause of action on April 17, 1987. Appellant, however, did not file a notice of appeal until November 4, 1988, more than a year and a half late. Moreover, during that period appellant filed no motions which would have tolled the time for filing a notice of appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (4), nor did he seek an extension of time for taking such an action from the district court pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5).

An appellant's failure to file a timely notice of appeal deprives an appellate court of jurisdiction. Compliance with Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) is a mandatory, jurisdictional prerequisite which this court can neither waive nor extend. Peake v. First Nat'l Bank & Trust Co., 717 F.2d 1016, 1018 (6th Cir. 1983). Fed. R. App. P. 26(b) specifically provides that this court cannot enlarge the time for filing a notice of appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b) (1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.