Unpublished Dispositionr.l. Smith & Associates, Inc. and Claire A. Singleton,registered Principal, Petitioners, v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 866 F.2d 1537 (D.C. Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - 866 F.2d 1537 (D.C. Cir. 1989) Jan. 31, 1989

Before MIKVA and RUTH B. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges, and LOUIS F. OBERDORFER,*  District Judge.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.


This petition for review of a final order of the Securities and Exchange Commission was presented on the briefs and oral arguments of counsel. The court has concluded that appropriate disposition of the case does not warrant a published opinion. See D.C. Cir. R. 14(c). We are satisfied, after full consideration of the record and the issues properly advanced before this court by petitioners, that the disciplinary action affirmed by the Commission in its March 3, 1988 order is neither without justification in fact nor unwarranted in law. Substantially for the reasons indicated in the Commission's opinion, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the order of the Commission contested by petitioners be affirmed.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. R. 15(b) (2).

 *

Sitting by designation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 292(a)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.