United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Richard P. Elliott, Defendant-appellant, 866 F.2d 1416 (4th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 866 F.2d 1416 (4th Cir. 1989) Submitted: Dec. 15, 1988. Decided: Jan. 27, 1989

Richard P. Elliott, appellant pro se.

Before JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Richard Paul Elliott appeals from an order of the district court which refused a rehearing after its denial of Elliott's motion to expunge certain material from his presentence report. We have already considered the issue Elliott raises here in United States v. Elliott, No. 87-7305 (4th Cir. Nov. 28, 1988) (unpublished), in which we affirmed the district court's denial of the motion to expunge. We state again that Elliott's proper remedy is to present his concerns to the Parole Commission for review pursuant to 28 C.F.R. Sec. 2.19(c). United States v. Legrano, 659 F.2d 17, 18 (4th Cir. 1981).

We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.