Jerry W. and Jeanette Mulder, Petitioners-appellants, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 861 F.2d 1333 (5th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseMerle R. Flagg, Dallas, Tex., for petitioners-appellants.
William F. Nelson, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Michael L. Paup, Chief Appellate Sec. Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Doris D. Coles, Gary R. Allen, Acting Chief, William S. Rose, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Janet Kay Jones, Richard Farber, John A. Dudeck, Jr., Roger M. Olsen, Asst. Chief, Washington, D.C., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the Decision of the United States Tax Court.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Sept. 19, 5th Cir. 1988, 855 F.2d 208)
Before WISDOM, REAVLEY and POLITZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The petition for rehearing correctly notes that the record in this cause does not show that the notice of deficiency was sent by certified mail with a return receipt requested. The record is silent about a return receipt; the references to such in our opinion should be deleted. Having reconsidered the appeal in light of this factual correction, we reach the same conclusion and reconfirm our earlier ruling. The petition for rehearing is DENIED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
