Jeffrey Rubin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Accotink Academy, Inc., Defendant-appellee,plaintiff Employment Lawyers Association, Amicus Curiae, 859 F.2d 150 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseJeffrey Rubin, appellant pro se.
Granville Clayton Warner Dickstein, Shapiro & Morin for appellee.
Woodley B. Osborne, Hanna, Gaspar, Osborne & Birkel, for amicus curiae.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey Rubin appeals from the district court's order dismissing Rubin's action alleging a violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and breach of contract. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rubin v. Accotink Academy, C/A No. 88-22 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
