Robert Thacker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. D.m. Souther, Michael E. Bumgarner, Defendants-appellees.robert Thacker, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael E. Bumgarner, Defendant-appellee, 854 F.2d 1318 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseRobert Thacker, appellant pro se.
Lacy H. Thornburg, LaVee Hamer Jackson, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for appellees.
Before WIDENER, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS, and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the records and the district court's opinions accepting the recommendations of the magistrate discloses that these two appeals from the orders refusing relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgments below on the reasoning of the district court. Thacker v. Souther, C/A No. 87-272-C-R (M.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 1988); Thacker v. Bumgarner, C/A No. 87-273-C-R (M.D.N.C. Feb. 26, 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
