Juan L. Steward, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Department of the Navy, Defendant-appellee, 852 F.2d 566 (4th Cir. 1988)
Annotate this CaseJuan L. Steward, appellant pro se.
Michael Anson Rhine (Office of the United States Attorney), for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record in the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from the court's order dismissing plaintiff's discrimination complaint brought under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16(c) is without merit. We accordingly affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Steward v. Department of the Navy, C/A No. 87-427-N (E.D. Va. Jan. 7, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
