Unpublished Disposition, 852 F.2d 1289 (9th Cir. 1988)Annotate this Case
Maurice McCRIMMON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.WELLS FARGO BANK, Defendant-Appellee.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 13, 1988.Decided July 18, 1988.
Before CHAMBERS, GOODWIN and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.
Maurice McCrimmon, pro se, appeals the district court's dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) of his employment discrimination claim brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. and under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal.Gov't Code Sec. 12900 et seq. against Wells Fargo Bank. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the decision below for the reasons stated by the district court in its order for judgment dismissing the action (CR 114).
McCrimmon failed to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence a prima facie case of discrimination. See Texas Dep't of Community Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 252-53 (1981); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 (1973). The record also fails to demonstrate that McCrimmon was forced to quit his job because of intolerable and discriminatory working conditions. Thorne v. City of El Segundo, 802 F.2d 1131, 1134 n. 1 (9th Cir. 1986). McCrimmon's remaining miscellaneous claims are without merit. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Circuit R. 36-3